Reuters reports that the Foreign Secretary, William Hague, has stated that the involvement in Libya will not turn into Iraq style conflict.
This despite the fact that Richard Dannatt, former head of the British army, has noted parallels with the campaign in Iraq.
Hague is quoted:
"It's very different from Iraq because of course in the case of Iraq there were very large numbers of ground forces deployed from Western nations.
That's clearly not the case and it's not going to be the case in Libya. It's right to point to the need for a political process when Gaddafi goes, and that of course is something we discuss with the National Transitional Council in Libya.
They have put forward their plans for that, for an interim government including figures from the regime, for the holding of elections and those are the right plans to put forward."
That's all very well, maybe. However, it may well take a lot more resources/military commitment to remove Gaddafi than are already in "play" there.
The Trial of Saddam Hussein and The Fallout of The War
The Trial of Saddam Hussein
Text
The fallout in the Middle East from the regime change in Iraq
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
Monday, May 23, 2011
Final Pullout
The last contingent of British troops finally left Iraq this weekend, more than eight years after the invasion.
Was this all worth it?
Was this all worth it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)